http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F13%2Fback-to-work%2F&seed_title=Back+to+work Random blatherings Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:35:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F13%2Fback-to-work%2F&seed_title=Back+to+work/comment-page-1/#comment-70 epong Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:40:34 +0000 http://www.schwieb.com/blog/archives/22#comment-70 I'm a new reader. Was referred straight from David Weiss' blog, http://davidweiss.blogspot.com/, to your Messenger post. I’m a new reader. Was referred straight from David Weiss’ blog, http://davidweiss.blogspot.com/, to your Messenger post.

]]> http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F13%2Fback-to-work%2F&seed_title=Back+to+work/comment-page-1/#comment-68 Frederik Slijkerman Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:46:45 +0000 http://www.schwieb.com/blog/archives/22#comment-68 Oh, and it would be insane to rewrite Office in Cocoa. Why rewrite something that works? Oh, and it would be insane to rewrite Office in Cocoa. Why rewrite something that works?

]]> http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F13%2Fback-to-work%2F&seed_title=Back+to+work/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Frederik Slijkerman Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:01:43 +0000 http://www.schwieb.com/blog/archives/22#comment-67 I'd just like to say that I enjoy your weblog and would like to see more entries! Regarding the Cocoa debate: To me it's very strange that there are two frameworks to begin with. It would have made sense to have Carbon as the underlying framework and build Cocoa on top of that. But I guess Cocoa was inherited from Next. For the moment, Carbon seems to do the job for me, although it's absolutely necessary to wrap it in a framework to make it somewhat easier to use -- just like Win32. :-) I’d just like to say that I enjoy your weblog and would like to see more entries! Regarding the Cocoa debate: To me it’s very strange that there are two frameworks to begin with. It would have made sense to have Carbon as the underlying framework and build Cocoa on top of that. But I guess Cocoa was inherited from Next. For the moment, Carbon seems to do the job for me, although it’s absolutely necessary to wrap it in a framework to make it somewhat easier to use — just like Win32.

]]>