<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pseudo Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schwieb.com/blog/2006/06/04/pseudo-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F04%2Fpseudo-code%2F&amp;seed_title=Pseudo+Code</link>
	<description>Random blatherings</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: odysseus</title>
		<link>http://www.schwieb.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwieb.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F06%2F04%2Fpseudo-code%2F&amp;seed_title=Pseudo+Code#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>odysseus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwieb.com/blog/archives/10#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks for explaining this. OK. here's another question. Does it really make sense still to have parts of a program (are there other apps besides Excel) coded in assembly language? Is basically all of the important Office code getting affected, if not revised, by the switch to Xcode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explaining this. OK. here&#8217;s another question. Does it really make sense still to have parts of a program (are there other apps besides Excel) coded in assembly language? Is basically all of the important Office code getting affected, if not revised, by the switch to Xcode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
